Well its the 30th of December and I can't stop thinking about the Art and Context module, work submitted etc so in theory I could just stop and carry on some kind of formulaic way or process. Unfortunately too many questions have arisen and lines of thought unresolved. So I can't and won't put it down until I am bit further down the road. Pandoras box has been opened.
Personal Conclusions or others?
I have to raise this point as the process can take two routes 1) read loads of other books to reach some kind of conclusion or 2) sit and think.
Both have pitfalls and advantages. A friend has recently finished her PhD and I questioned her approach to her project. An interesting quote, she said for her ( and i think anybody at this level) it was important to be well read so as not to bring up the obvious, and at least try and bring a new angle on a subject). I fully understand this, but as a Ma student I still feel (for me at least ) the latter is a better way at present, as reasoned thought (with all its dead ends and possibly simple conclusions) brings a depth of understanding that second hand knowledge can never equel. Yes it takes longer and is riskier (including complete failure) but its far more satisfying finding a scholar agreeing (or not) with a line of argument than to just 'quote.'
So i have been reading a lot about the concept of 'space, void and mass' and previous ideas and new springing off some other peoples thoughts. So a mixture as time constraints (and my eyes) allow.
The Woods
The personal experience of trying to create a piece of work, along a certain theory has led me to conclude so many angles of design and perspective (whether as an individual or trying to interpret the end user in whom we serve). A few weeks on and I am coming up with solutions that don't sit that well as a designer. The big one being is 'Framework'. That is what we design. The framework will always be loaded with expectation and disappointment, but thats why it needs to be a frame work. Anything to dogmatic and the community left behind with not be able to leave their finger print on the space as it evolves and therefore never adopt the space. With the result that it will be left to local council who will do the minimum as the Council tax payers who shout the loudest will get their way ( put it this way it won't be someone trying to hold down a job on the minimum wage).
Conclusions thus far
1) Modernism never existed as everything has a motive, either from rebellion from something or conformity for acceptance. An opposite is an opposite of something therefore 'nothing' (year zero) cannot be achieved.Year zero only existed once, everything from that point will always have allegory, a time line, and a cause and effect on the aforementioned timeline (ultimately decay ,loss of energy, darkness, void). This is our constraint we can't escape it.
2) So as an individual I accept this, my baggage/aspirations/distorted view will always come through. So 'pespective' is a distorted lens that we all see through, and yet to ourselves as individuals is as clear as a spring morning. I can only attempt to interpret how others see and aspire. So it has to be an effort from day one to include the community that I will effect. They also need to understand this fact, big picture, long term cause and effect.
3) Framework for others to evolve as they see fit. I cannot socially engineer. Modernism tried this and failed. Because humans are complex and predictions of future behaviour have nearly always been wrong (eventually, at first a theory may well work, but evolution will always take the shortest route, which we so often miss).
4) Escape. Which can also be termed as 'fantasy'. Most movies portray an idealised world for us to escape to for a couple of hours. Especially the 'feel-good' film. And there is nothing wrong with that, its what we do to regulate (just like the brain uses dreams to stop us going mad, I think 5 days with out sleep starts to lead to madness) and keep our sanity in this unnaturally stressed world that we are still adapting to. So escape and changing escape/fantasy within a design in an urban context is crucial.
5) Play. For adults and children. Another way to release the valve of our restrictive lives.
6) Time line of perspective. I came up with six ( again this is not a fixed rule as baggage effects each of us) stages that describe what i go through over time concerning a space( that becomes a place due to revelation and memory).
first observation= wonder through discovery
second= familiarity which shrinks the space
third= invisibility, you just don't notice it
forth= imprint in your mind/ permanent memory
fifth= allegory forms as a sequence of the aforementioned events in time
sixth= nostalgia refection of youth, as death approaches
7) Lanscape is a manmade concept,
Note, shadow on tree and the ghost behind. Once observed can never revert for the individual as well as the collective.
Enough. I would love to do my symposium again as i think i have cemented some idea's and thrown out others. plus not being under pressure to 'think' has meant more free thought has come to the front of my mind.
I think I could do virtually the whole symposium around a Frank Capra film Eg 'Its a Wonderful life' or a Hollywood musical Eg 'Calamity Jane'
(note embedding not working on you tube.GRRR, click on link etc)
It's a Wonderful life
Colorised version, whole film. Note Frank Capra nearly had the film turned down for its Anti-Capatalist message. Idealised yes, but 80% of a goal is still worth more than doing nothing.
It's a Wonderful Life: Colorized Version *HD* - Part 1 of 1 - YouTube
↵ Use original player
← Replay
Calamity Jane
Good old Calamity Jane, pure escapism, rufftim and tufftim, can't help but feel good after anything with the Gal next door 'Doris Day'. Bless her. Though off the set her life was anything but ideal. So even those seemingly who have it all financially, don't ...thank God!!
The Deadwood Stage from Calamity Jane (1953) - YouTube
Check out 'I can do with out you' and 'Windy city'
